10 Timeless Ways to Capture Attention and Engage Learners

Click to read the article on Ajjuliani.com.

Every teacher and school leader I know has faced this reality: students don’t come to class automatically engaged. You are competing with phones, notifications, distractions, and sometimes even a student’s own belief that school is “just something to get through” and a game they don’t want to play.

Believe me, I’ve been there both as a teacher and a student.

The good news? Engagement isn’t magic. It isn’t about gimmicks or the latest app. It’s about timeless principles and practices that have worked for generations of great teachers, coaches, and leaders. In my new book, The 27 Principles of Engagement, I pull together stories from history and practical classroom moves to show how we can capture attention and keep it.

Here are 10 timeless ways to engage learners, and why they still work right now.

As a young girl in England, Jane Goodall once vanished for hours. Her frantic mother finally found her in the chicken coop, notebook in hand, watching silently. Jane explained that she was waiting to see exactly how a hen laid an egg. Most parents would have scolded her for disappearing. Her mother, instead, praised her determination. That single gesture offeeding curiosity rather than punishing it, ignited a lifelong fire.

Decades later, Goodall entered the forests of Tanzania with little more than binoculars and questions. Could chimpanzees use tools? Do they have personalities? What if they are not so different from us?

Her patient observations shocked the scientific world. She watched a chimp strip leaves from a twig to fish termites from a mound, which was the first recorded case of non-human tool use. She saw mothers comforting infants, males forming alliances, communities grieving deaths. These discoveries blurred the line between “human” and “animal,” rewriting textbooks.

Goodall often emphasized that her breakthroughs were not products of formal training. She did not enter the forest armed with rigid hypotheses. She entered with open-ended questions. “The greatest danger to our future,” she later wrote, “is apathy.” Curiosity, she believed, was the antidote.

John Wooden, head coach of UCLA basketball, presided over ten national championships in twelve years, a dynasty unmatched in sports.

But Wooden’s genius was not only strategy. It was player attention management.

Before every season, Wooden gathered his player in the locker room. There, he taught them how to put on their socks. Yes, he taught 18-22 year old men how to put on socks. 

Slowly, methodically, he demonstrated how to smooth out wrinkles and lace shoes properly. Some laughed at the absurdity. Wooden was unshaken. “Wrinkles cause blisters,” he said. “Blisters win games for opponents.”

What does this have to do with distraction? Well, everything.

Wooden understood that players entered practice buzzing with all kinds of nervous energy. They had fear of failure, anticipation of competition, and of course adrenaline. He did not fight those jitters or scold them away. Instead, he ritualized the process. 

The act of dressing, of lacing shoes correctly, of warming up through a precise sequence of drills, gave nervous energy a job. Anxiety converted into rhythm. Scattered thoughts collapsed into focus.

On game day, the same rituals applied. Wooden’s teams moved through a predictable sequence of preparation. Simple fundamentals before gameplay, layups before long shots, team huddles before tip-off. By the time the game began, the nervous chaos of anticipation had been redirected into readiness.

Wooden never shouted over his players’ jitters. He folded them into ritual. He turned distraction into discipline. His dynasty was built not only on talent, but on the steady transformation of nervous energy into purposeful engagement.

In the mid-20th century, Rachel Carson was a quiet but determined marine biologist and writer who believed that science should begin with wonder. Her books, such as The Sea Around Us and Silent Spring, were not dry compilations of facts but living documents of inquiry. She asked questions that unsettled complacency.

In Silent Spring (1962), Carson posed a question that reverberated around the world: What happens when we drench our environment in pesticides without asking about the long-term effects? She challenged chemical companies, government agencies, and the public to ask not just whether pesticides killed pests, but whether they also disrupted ecosystems, harmed wildlife, and imperiled human health.

Her writing modeled inquiry as both scientific and moral. She asked: Who speaks for the birds, whose voices fall silent? Who considers the soil, the streams, the children yet unborn?

Carson faced ridicule and resistance, but her questions could not be ignored. Congressional hearings followed. Environmental protections emerged. The modern environmental movement was born not because she provided all the answers, but because she insisted on better questions.

Bill Walsh, head coach of the San Francisco 49ers, was reshaping American football. Known as the “Genius,” Walsh introduced the West Coast Offense—a system of short, precise passes that valued timing over brute strength. But the real brilliance was not in the plays themselves. It was in how he revealed them.

Walsh was a master of psychological suspense. For weeks he would drill his players in one set of tendencies: a specific formation, a particular motion, a predictable rhythm. Defenses, watching film, learned to expect what seemed inevitable.

Then, at just the right moment—often in the most critical drives—Walsh broke the pattern. He unveiled a wrinkle that appeared entirely new: a tight end releasing downfield when everyone expected a block, a running back slipping into the flat while receivers decoyed deep. Defenses, lulled into false security, were caught completely off guard.

The mystery wasn’t accidental. It was engineered. Walsh knew that attention sharpens when expectations are disrupted. His players trusted him because they knew the surprises were rehearsed endlessly in practice, hidden until the moment they mattered most. Suspense built loyalty, because they wanted to be part of the secret that would one day be unveiled.

Walsh’s approach mirrors the classroom. Reveal too much too soon, and curiosity dies. Reveal too late, and frustration overwhelms. But hold just enough back, for just long enough, and the learner leans forward, compelled to resolve the tension. Walsh proved that mystery is about timing the reveal so the payoff has maximum weight.

In the 1960s, educational psychologist Benjamin Bloom began questioning the traditional grading system. He saw how one-shot exams sorted students into winners and losers without giving them the chance to truly learn. Bloom believed all students could reach high levels of understanding if given enough time, feedback, and opportunities to improve.

His model, known as mastery learning, shifted focus from grades to growth. Instead of branding a student with a failing mark, Bloom encouraged teachers to diagnose gaps, reteach, and reassess until mastery was achieved. A C or D wasn’t the end—it was an invitation to try again.

Bloom’s research demonstrated that with structured feedback and corrective instruction, the majority of students could achieve at high levels. He reframed grades as checkpoints, not verdicts. Growth, not sorting, became the true goal.

Benjamin Franklin’s life was one long experiment in improvement. In his twenties, frustrated with his own flaws, he devised what he called a “bold and arduous project of arriving at moral perfection.” He believed that habits could be built the same way muscles were strengthened—through repetition and intentional practice. But he also knew repetition could feel tedious. So Franklin designed a system that made self-discipline feel like a game.

He chose thirteen virtues he wanted to master: temperance, silence, order, frugality, industry, sincerity, justice, moderation, cleanliness, tranquility, chastity, humility, and resolution. Each week, he focused on a single virtue while keeping the others in view. He created a chart with the days of the week running across the top and the virtues listed down the side. Every time he violated a virtue, he marked the corresponding box. His goal was to make as few marks as possible, treating each week like a round of play.

In The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, he explained his system with pride: “I was surprised to find myself so much fuller of faults than I had imagined; but I had the satisfaction of seeing them diminish.” He even described the joy of seeing a week’s chart with fewer blotches than the last. For Franklin, this was progress, and progress was engaging.

Franklin’s method had all the elements of a game: rules (the virtues), feedback (the marks), visible progress (the charts), and a goal (self-mastery). He admitted he never achieved perfection, but he didn’t need to. The “game” kept him motivated for decades, turning the grind of moral effort into a playful pursuit of streaks and clean charts.

Today, his system looks familiar. Habit-tracking apps, fitness streaks, and productivity dashboards all echo Franklin’s idea: when progress is visible and structured like a game, repetition becomes addictive. Franklin proves that even the most monotonous self-improvement can engage us when gamified.

In 1980, the U.S. Olympic hockey team faced an impossible task. They were amateurs—college players, many barely out of their teens—going up against the Soviet Union, a team widely considered the greatest in the world. The Soviets had dominated international hockey for decades, winning nearly every Olympic gold since the 1950s. Few believed the Americans stood a chance.

Herb Brooks, the team’s coach, thought differently. He believed in pushing players beyond their perceived limits, and he designed practices that did just that. His infamous conditioning drills—players skating back and forth until they nearly collapsed—were brutal. After one dismal performance in an exhibition game, Brooks had his team skate “Herbies” long after the arena lights were turned off and the crowd had left. Exhausted players gasped for air, angry and bewildered. But Brooks wasn’t punishing them; he was forging resilience.

His mantra was clear: “You’re not talented enough to win on talent alone.” To beat the Soviets, they would need discipline, fitness, and belief that they could rise above themselves. Brooks created a crucible where players discovered strength they didn’t know they had.

When the Americans finally faced the Soviets in Lake Placid, the game was expected to be a rout. Instead, the young Americans shocked the world. They skated faster, hit harder, and never backed down. In the final moments, broadcaster Al Michaels delivered his famous line: “Do you believe in miracles? Yes!” The U.S. had defeated the invincible Soviets 4–3.

The players often said that Brooks believed in them more than they believed in themselves. His relentless demands forced them to discover abilities they didn’t know they possessed. The “Miracle on Ice” was more than an upset—it was the story of a coach unlocking surprise potential in his team.

Seymour Papert, a South African mathematician and computer scientist, believed that children learn best when they are creating something that matters to them. A protégé of Jean Piaget, Papert moved beyond theory into practice, developing what he called constructionism: the idea that students build knowledge most effectively by building things they care about.

In the 1960s and 1970s, Papert helped design the Logo programming language, famous for its “turtle graphics.” Students could command a small on-screen turtle to move forward, turn, or draw lines. At first glance, it looked like play—a child typing commands to make the turtle draw a square or a spiral. But Papert saw something deeper: as children chased their passion for making the turtle dance across the screen, they absorbed mathematical concepts—angles, loops, variables—almost unconsciously.

Papert told stories of students who once dreaded math coming alive at a computer terminal. One boy spent hours experimenting with commands to make the turtle draw a perfect circle, adjusting and refining until he mastered the geometry. Another created a digital fireworks display, teaching himself trigonometry along the way. To Papert, this wasn’t “sneaking in” math—it was unleashing math through passion.

Later, at MIT’s Media Lab, Papert pushed further, working with robotics kits that allowed students to build machines that walked, crawled, or sensed light. The children weren’t interested in abstract circuitry; they were interested in making a robot that could follow them around or compete in a race. But in pursuing those passions, they learned programming logic, engineering principles, and problem-solving strategies far more deeply than through rote instruction.

Papert argued that too often schools tried to motivate students with extrinsic rewards—grades, tests, punishments. Instead, he believed schools should harness what he called “hard fun.” Passion-driven projects weren’t always easy, but they were deeply satisfying. “The best learning,” Papert wrote, “happens when the learner takes charge.”

His vision still resonates today: students coding video games to understand physics, creating YouTube tutorials to explain historical concepts, or designing 3D-printed models that demonstrate geometry. Papert showed that when teachers connect to passion, the path into deeper learning opens naturally.

In Japan, a practice known as jugyō kenkyū, or Lesson Study, illustrates the same principle at the classroom level. Teachers collaboratively design lessons, then observe, analyze, and refine them. Over time, this process has created a culture of stable routines in classrooms across the country.

Students know the flow: a problem is presented, discussion follows, students attempt solutions, and the teacher facilitates reflection. The ritual structure gives predictability. Every student understands the rhythm of a lesson, reducing anxiety and creating shared expectations.

But within that ritual, variety emerges. Teachers continually refine problems to spark new thinking. A math teacher may use a familiar format but swap in a surprising context—using train schedules, origami folds, or cooking recipes to frame equations. The ritual of the lesson anchors the class; the variety of problems keeps engagement high.

Researchers who study Japanese classrooms note that this combination produces both comfort and curiosity. Students lean into challenges because they know the structure will hold. The rituals provide stability, and the subtle shifts provide energy.

In the early 20th century, Russian psychologist Lev Vygotsky gave educators a concept that still shapes classrooms today: the zone of proximal development (commonly referred to as ZPD).

Vygotsky observed that children learn best when challenged just beyond what they can do independently, provided they receive the right guidance or support. Too easy, and there is no growth. Too hard, and frustration overwhelms. But in the ZPD (the sweet spot between boredom and despair) engagement flourishes.

Imagine a child who can solve simple addition problems alone but struggles with multi-step word problems. Left alone, the child gives up. But with a teacher’s hints—drawing pictures, breaking steps down—the child succeeds. Over time, the once-impossible problem becomes manageable, and the ZPD shifts upward.

Vygotsky emphasized scaffolding which looked like temporary supports provided by teachers, peers, or tools. Like scaffolding around a building, these supports are removed as the learner grows stronger. The struggle remains, but it is calibrated struggle.

These 10 principles are just a taste of the 27 timeless practices I unpack in my new book. Each principle is illustrated with stories of great educators, leaders, and innovators (you saw a few mentioned in this pos). They are all people who mastered the art of engagement long before smartphones or TikTok.

Engagement is not about being flashy or entertaining. It’s about being human, social, meaning-centered, and relevant. The world keeps changing, but these principles adapt, and they still work.

👉 If you want practical, story-driven strategies you and your teachers can put to work tomorrow, check out The 27 Principles of Engagement (free audio book).

PS - Interested in bringing me in to work with your staff on A.I. with a purpose, Meaningful and Relevant Learning, and Engagement in the Classroom? Learn more on my speaking page or email me at any time!